Bring us a tender from anywhere and taypra tells you whether it is worth bidding, then writes it from your own evidence, against the buyer's own scoring marks. It also finds, matches and scores public-sector tenders automatically.
We continuously monitor Find a Tender and Contracts Finder, match what is published to your firm and score the fit, so the ones worth your time come to you.
212 pages, 23 scored questions, answered in front of you. Takes less than 20 seconds, and there is nothing to sign up for.
Thirty minutes on a call while we run it live against a real pack. No slides.
This is Lot 2 of a real published framework, read in full.
Every number below comes out of a document this firm already had.
Every page, including the ones the questions were hiding in.
Each with its word limit and its scoring guidance attached.
Real contracts and real performance figures, dated and sourced.
Two missing documents would close all four. Named now, so you fix them before you submit rather than after.
Nothing was invented. Nothing was guessed. Nothing went in that you cannot point at a document for.
Every other tool will write you a confident paragraph about your social value record whether or not you have one. We will not. Where the evidence is not in your own documents, the answer says so, and names the document that would close it. That is the difference between a bid you can sign and one you hope nobody checks.
Write something plausible and let you find out at scoring.
Name the gap, name the document that closes it, and leave the space for you.
“The difference from a chatbot is real: pulling evidence from a client's own documents first, then only using AI to tidy up what was found, is the right way to build this. The approach will earn trust with cautious public sector buyers.”
Illustrative example. Every sentence in a real draft carries a citation like this one.
Below: a tender pack of 14 documents and 212 pages, holding 23 scored questions. This is an illustration, not a live run. Send us a pack you are bidding on and we will run yours properly.
A mid-sized responsive repairs and heating contractor, the kind of firm that bids but has no bid team.
Strong on first-time-fix and voids performance, thin on social value.
We continuously monitor Find a Tender and Contracts Finder, across sectors, and rank the opportunities that fit you.
Public sector onlySend us any tender pack, from any buyer. We pull out every requirement and question and tell you which ones you can evidence and which you cannot. That is your bid or no-bid answer.
Any tender, any buyerEvery question drafted from your own evidence, written to the buyer's marking scheme, each claim traceable to a document you already hold. Gaps are named, never filled with invention.
Any tender, any buyerOnly the finding is limited to the public sector, and only because private buyers do not publish.
Public-sector notices found, matched and scored against the rules you set, so the pipeline is a working view rather than an inbox.
A structured, dated record of your delivery, accreditations and outcomes that every answer is drawn from, and that keeps its own gap list.
What you bid for, what you could evidence and where you fell short, held in one place so the next decision is better informed than the last.
taypra is the operating platform for organisations that compete for contracts. The bid is where most firms start with us, and it is the commercial entry point, but discovery, evidence and procurement performance sit around it.
taypra is not a general AI writing tool. It is a private engine that learns your firm's strengths, reads the buyer's own marking scheme out of their documents, and writes to that scheme. It tracks what you can prove and what has expired, so your effort goes where it can win.
A language model will give you a confident answer either way. What it cannot do is tell you which parts your own records will stand behind. Nor does it hand you the rest of what a submission needs: an executive summary drawn from the answers themselves, a bid or no-bid decision on a single page for sign-off, and a list of exactly what you could not evidence. The difference is not the writing, it is what a scorer can actually award marks for.
“We have extensive experience delivering maintenance services across the public sector, with robust processes, a highly trained workforce and a strong commitment to quality and customer satisfaction.”
“18,400 jobs completed at 96.1% first-time fix, against a 92% contractual target.”
Annual performance return, year three · April 2024Four reasons. Everything else on this page is evidence for one of them.
Each scored question in the pack, found wherever it is buried, with the word limit and the marking guidance the buyer published for it, all drafted in one pass so the answers are consistent with each other.
Answers are built from your contracts, your KPI returns, your accreditations and your case studies, and each figure carries a link to the document behind it. A scorer can check it, which is what earns the mark.
Taken straight from the pack, applied while writing and checked again afterwards, because a language model cannot reliably count its own words.
Every pack you run and every bid you win deepens a record only your firm can see. It is never pooled with other customers, so the advantage cannot be copied. A named person at your firm reviews and submits; Taypra never submits a bid.
Every outside company involved, named. Ask and the data protection agreement comes by return.
Scroll sideways to see the whole diagram →
| Layer | Supplier | What it does and what leaves |
|---|---|---|
| The app | Vercel | Serves the pages you use, from the London edge. Holds no customer documents and stores nothing of yours. |
| Your data | Supabase | Postgres in the London region. Your documents, evidence and drafts. Every firm separated at the database level, tested on every change we ship. |
| Meaning | Voyage AI | Turns a passage into numbers so it can be found by meaning, not by keyword. Contracted so your content is not used for training. US company. |
| Writing | Anthropic | Drafts an answer from passages already found. Never your whole estate. Contracted so your content is not used for training. US company. |
| Work in | UK government | Find a Tender and Contracts Finder. Nothing of yours goes to them. Public data taken under the Open Government Licence. |
Two things we will put in writing.
Primary storage in London. UK GDPR.
Enforced deep in the database rather than in the app, and tested automatically every time we change anything.
The best firms do not lose on capability. They lose on time, and on the bid.
No bid manager, no library, no evenings rebuilding the same evidence from memory.
The repeatable bulk of every bid drafted in a fraction of the time, so your people spend theirs on the commercials, the standout examples and the win themes.
Every bid tool has a content library. A library is a folder full of old documents. This is an organised record of what your firm has actually done, every fact dated, tied to the document it came from, and marked with where you're allowed to use it.
A completeness score runs between the two, so you can see exactly where you stand from minute one. The gaps are not a failing, they are the list of documents that would make your next submission stronger, ranked by how often buyers ask for them.
How a firm gets from a shared drive and four years of memory to the screen above.
Previous bids won and lost, contract reports, KPI returns, policies, accreditations, case studies. Whatever format they are in. Most firms find this takes an hour of looking, not a week.
We pull out the facts, date them, tie each one to the document it came from, and strip out the marketing language that can't be backed up. This is our work, not yours.
Around ninety minutes. You confirm the facts, correct what is wrong and mark what has expired. Nobody knows your record better than you do, and nothing goes into a bid that you have not approved.
Trades, regions, contract sizes and the work you will not take on. This is what the matching runs against, and you can change it whenever your firm changes.
Public-sector notices are found, matched and scored against those rules from then on, with the reasoning shown so you can see why something is in front of you.
From that point the library is live and it deepens on its own. Every pack you run and every bid you win adds to it, which is why the fourth bid takes less of your time than the first.
Hours, not weeks. Structuring your evidence takes hours, not days. What sets the pace is how quickly you can send your files and spare ninety minutes to check them. If your records are thin we will tell you before you commit, not after.
A monthly subscription priced on the size of your firm. No annual lock-in.
Hours, not weeks, from sending files to a drafted pack. Roughly two to three hours of your own time.
Send the files you already have. One ninety minute session to check them.
From £780 per seat per month. We are early, and we are looking for a small number of foundation customers. Pricing is set two ways: by the size of your firm, measured on turnover, and by how much of the work you want us to do.
Opportunities from the mandated central feed, the one the Procurement Act requires authorities to publish through, matched to your firm on your own evidence, with the reasoning shown. You write the bids.
Everything above, plus every scored question in a pack drafted from your own evidence, inside every word limit, with the gaps named. You review and submit.
Everything above, with experienced human oversight on the bid itself. For firms who want the work done rather than the tool.
Foundation members get a fixed price held for the life of their first term. Talk to us and we will tell you where your firm sits.
Tell us about your firm and we'll prepare a live look at the frameworks in your patch before we speak.